njp wroteHello fellow members.
High ! And thanks for this. Yes, pictures will be interresting to many here who would like some ideas to make their setup a little less ugly
njp wrote1)
You shouldn't have to parse your library again after a reboot. Maybe it's a "feature" of SMB shares on the Pi, I don't know. But it definitely shouldn't happen.
I'm really not sure if overclocking is usefull for our use case. We wan't stability, we wan't a good i²s or USB operation, which may be altered when running hot...
Ah and in my personnal opinion, database update is slow because the NAS is slow ! Not CPU bound.
But if you want to do it: connect to your machine via SSH (or whatever shell you're using if your other computer is not under Linux) and do
#sudo raspi-config
You'll have a nice option to overclock.
Your library is written on your SD cart, but class 10 is suposedly more than enough. Again, going "the faster way" would mean a SSD connected via USB. Not sure if that's a long term solution. (not one I will chose).
And yes, NFS will probably always have more fans among linux users than SMB. I use it and have no issues.
2)
Yes, probably because you're not connected to your Wifi access point when the mount is attempted. I don't know how to make it wait for this. (this also explains your permanent library updates on boot: going to the mounts options, re-adding the SMB shares will trigger a library update. Normal behaviour, I guess.
3)
To test througput, connect again via SSH, check that your NAS shares are mounted, and copy a large file from a SMB directory to a local directory (like /home/rune for exemple, or /root/ if you're connected as root.
Since i'll be integrating this system I'd like to put the best wifi component in. Aside from the Edimax WiFi (Ralink based) I purchased a TP-Link TL-WN722N (detable antenna also - this is based on the Atheros chipset I believe). Edimax connects and stays at roughly 65mbit/s and the tp-link at 72mbit/s. Stock antennas. This isn't the be all end all as we know, and is there a way I can easily test wireless throughput with some kind of distro or app (got another SD to load up) and simple commands? This is my downfall. Want to integrate the best dongle of the two unless anyone here has knowledge and experience, and can safely say yes one chipset will be better than the other regardless of the speed.
4)
The speed numbers you give should be more than enough for CD quality streaming from your NAS.
CD rips in WAV format are : 16*2*44100=1.4 mbit/s
I wouln't bother buying a 300N router if audio is the only thing you're interrested in.
Cheers!